Seeing the outcome of an encounter with a conical intersection


There is a nice JACS paper Population Branching in the Conical Intersection of the Retinal Chromophore Revealed by Multipulse Ultrafast Optical Spectroscopy
by Goran Zgrablić, Anna Maria Novello, and Fulvio Parmigiani.

It looks at how the polarity of a solvent changes the outcome of the photo-isomerisation (trans-cis) reaction of a retinal molecule. A similar reaction is responsible for vision: it seems that the protein environment is key to the speed and selectivity of the reaction.

This experimental study finds that as one increases the polarity of the solvent (as measured by the static dielectric constant) the branching ratio for the blue to green/purple curves in the figure above increases.

This is argued to be broadly consistent with a theoretical study published earlier this year, Dynamical Friction Effects on the Photoisomerization of a Model Protonated Schiff Base in Solution, by João Pedro Malhado, Riccardo Spezia, and James T. Hynes.

A key insight seems to be the schematic Figure below which contrasts the case of water (top) and acetonitrile (below). It shows the ground and excited state PESs as a function of the twist angle (torsion) associated with cis-trans isomerisation.
Water is claim to have "fast" dynamics which increases the probability of direct transition to the lower surface. In acetonitrile the system can stay longer on the excited state surface and away from the conical intersection seam allowing it to follow the dashed trajectory above, leading to a larger formation of cis.

However, the authors point out how their study involves several key debatable assumptions including
  • nuclear and solved dynamics can be modelled by a Generalised Langevin Equation (GLE); this means it is classical (I am not sure to what extent it is overdamped)
  • non-adiabatic transitions between the excited and ground state potential energy surfaces (PESs) can be modelled by the surface hopping algorithm of Tully
  • a simple parametrisation of the PESs
  • rough estimates for the frictional parameters for the GLE
To me all this underscores just how a quantitative description of the quantum dynamics near a conical intersection in the presence of a dissipative environment is such a basic and important outstanding problem.

Comments

  1. RiccardoFebruary 8, 2012 at 4:33 AM

    Hi!
    thanks for being interested in this work (I am co-author of the theoretical paper) !
    Riccardo

    ReplyDelete
  2. GogoFebruary 17, 2012 at 8:51 PM

    Thank you for mentioning our experimental work on retinal in various solvents. Still, there are many thing we don't understand well, especially why acetonitrile is so different from all other solvents.
    Goran Z.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is it an Unidentified Superconducting Object (USO)?

If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new material. There is a long history of this and it is worth considering the wise observations of Robert Cava , back in 1997, contained in a tutorial lecture. It would have been useful indeed in the early days of the field [cuprate superconductors] to have set up a "commission" to set some minimum standard of data quality and reproducibility for reporting new superconductors. An almost countless number of "false alarms" have been reported in the past decade, some truly spectacular. Koichi Kitazawa from the University of Tokyo coined these reports "USOs", for Unidentified Superconducting Objects , in a clever cross-cultural double entendre likening them to UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects, which certainly are their equivalent in many ways) and to "lies" in the Japanese translation of USO.   These have caused g
Read more

What is Herzberg-Teller coupling?

Image
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thrown around. Google scholar yields more than 3000 hits. But I have found its precise meaning and the relevant physics hard to pin down. Quantum mechanics in chemistry by Schatz and Ratner is an excellent book , but the discussion on page 204 did not help me. "Herzberg-Teller" never appears in Atkins' Molecular quantum mechanics. So here is my limited understanding. Herzberg and Teller wanted to understand why one observed certain vibronic (combined electronic and vibrational) transitions that were not expected, particularly some that were expected to be forbidden on symmetry grounds. " Intensity borrowing " occurred. Herzberg and Teller pointed out that his could be understood if the dipole transition moment for the electronic transition depended on the nuclear co-ordinate associated with the vibration. In the Franck-Condo
Read more

What should be the order of authors on a conference poster or talk?

I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With regard to paper authorship my general rule is that the person who does the bulk of the work, including actually writing the paper should be the first author. Doug Natelson has a good post on co-authorship , that I largely agree with. My only difference is that I am not really convinced that good practice prevails in the majority of circumstances. I fear there are increasing numbers of co-authors, particularly senior ones, with marginal contributions. But, what about conference talks and posters? Many of these are based on work that is already or about to be published. Should the author order be identical as the associated papers? I am not sure it should necessarily be. My tentative view is that the person who writes and submits the abstract and actually prepares and presents the post/talk should be the first author. Perhaps they should also highlig
Read more